↓ Skip to main content

Detecting signs of deterioration in young patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting signs of deterioration in young patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01798-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay H. Dewa, Arturas Kalniunas, Stephen Orleans-Foli, Sofia Pappa, Paul Aylin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 45 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 45 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,078,670
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#347
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,002
of 434,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.