You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differences in problem behaviour among ethnic minority and majority preschoolers in the Netherlands and the role of family functioning and parenting factors as mediators: the Generation R Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1092 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ilse JE Flink, Pauline W Jansen, Tinneke MJ Beirens, Henning Tiemeier, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Vincent WV Jaddoe, Albert Hofman, Hein Raat |
Abstract |
Studies have shown that, compared to native counterparts, preschoolers from ethnic minorities are at an increased risk of problem behaviour. Socio-economic factors only partly explain this increased risk. This study aimed to further unravel the differences in problem behaviour among ethnic minority and native preschoolers by examining the mediating role of family functioning and parenting factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 33 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,740,534
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,818
of 14,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,126
of 280,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#208
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.