↓ Skip to main content

A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 3,036)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, September 2021
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-107989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane M Tiller, Louise A Keogh, Aideen M McInerney-Leo, Andrea Belcher, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Tiffany Boughtwood, Penny Gleeson, Grace Dowling, Anya Prince, Yvonne Bombard, Yann Joly, Martin Delatycki, Ingrid M Winship, Margaret Otlowski, Paul Lacaze

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 509. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#46,900
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,403
of 423,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.