↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Hydrodynamic Models for Developed Mixing Instability Flows : Analytical “0D„ Evaluation Criteria, and Comparison of Single-and Two-Phase Flow Approaches

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

syllabi
1 institution with syllabi

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Hydrodynamic Models for Developed Mixing Instability Flows : Analytical “0D„ Evaluation Criteria, and Comparison of Single-and Two-Phase Flow Approaches
Published by
ADS, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/11531746
ISBNs
978-3-54-031623-7, 978-3-54-028330-0
Authors

Llor, Antoine

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,432,666
of 13,453,039 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#17,020
of 22,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,191
of 262,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#75
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,453,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.