You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigation of inpatient convalescent rehabilitation outcomes in branch atheromatous disease (BAD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Stroke, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3995/jstroke.35.441 |
| Authors |
Joe Senda, Keiichi Ito, Ken Ohyama, Noritaka Yoneyama, Kazuhiro Hara, Ryoichi Nakamura, Tomoko Noda, Atsushi Hashizume, Naoki Atsuta, Mizuki Ito, Hirohisa Watanabe, Keizo Yasui, Tomomitsu Kotake, Yoshihisa Kida, Hideo Kishimoto, Gen Sobue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,883,585
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Stroke
#8
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,355
of 289,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Stroke
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them