You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The politics of funding universal healthcare: Diverting local tobacco taxes to subsidise the national health scheme in Indonesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/app5.334 |
| Authors |
Abdillah Ahsan, Elisabeth Kramer, Nadhila Adani, Askar Muhammad, Nadira Amalia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 28% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,699,342
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
#67
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,893
of 438,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.