↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Central retinal vein occlusion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 2,198)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Blogs Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Central retinal vein occlusion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report
Published in
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, January 2021
DOI 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1477_21
Pubmed ID
34571653
Authors

Beatriz Endo, Silvana Bahamon, DayronF Martínez-Pulgarín

Abstract

A central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) case in a patient developed with sudden blurred vision in some hemifield areas of his left eye, maintaining 20/20 vision 15-days after the COVID-19 vaccination. Initial retinal findings were venous dilation and tortuosity with dispersing dot hemorrhages. Fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed a non-ischemic CRVO diagnosis, and a complete blood panel was requested with average results. An intravitreal steroid dose was applied. A decrease in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (20/30) with more intraretinal hemorrhages was documented. An intravitreal dose of bevacizumab and oral apixaban were added with a final BCVA of 20/20 with decreased hemorrhages. There is no specific causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and CRVO. Without previous risk factors and positive treatment response, this case may correlate the first COVID-19 vaccine dose and the event.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 29 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 34 61%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#525,323
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
#18
of 2,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,548
of 503,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.