You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are parrots naive realists? Kea behave as if the real and virtual worlds are continuous
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amalia P. M. Bastos, Patrick M. Wood, Alex H. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| New Zealand | 6 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Benin | 1 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 46% |
| Scientists | 18 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
| Psychology | 3 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#179,357
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#223
of 3,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,931
of 435,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.