↓ Skip to main content

Additional risk factors for infection by multidrug-resistant pathogens in healthcare-associated infection: a large cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Additional risk factors for infection by multidrug-resistant pathogens in healthcare-associated infection: a large cohort study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa Cardoso, Orquídea Ribeiro, Irene César Aragão, Altamiro Costa-Pereira, António Eugénio Sarmento

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus regarding the definition of risk factors for healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). The purpose of this study was to identify additional risk factors for HCAI, which are not included in the current definition of HCAI, associated with infection by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, in all hospitalized infected patients from the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,756,260
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#845
of 7,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,247
of 280,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#14
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.