↓ Skip to main content

Human blood RNA stabilization in samples collected and transported for a large biobank

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human blood RNA stabilization in samples collected and transported for a large biobank
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nur Duale, Gunnar Brunborg, Kjersti S Rønningen, Thomas Briese, Jeanette Aarem, Kaja K Aas, Per Magnus, Camilla Stoltenberg, Ezra Susser, W Ian Lipkin

Abstract

The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) is a nation-wide population-based pregnancy cohort initiated in 1999, comprising more than 108.000 pregnancies recruited between 1999 and 2008. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of integrating RNA analyses into existing MoBa protocols. We compared two different blood RNA collection tube systems - the PAXgene™ Blood RNA system and the Tempus™ Blood RNA system - and assessed the effects of suboptimal blood volumes in collection tubes and of transportation of blood samples by standard mail. Endpoints to characterize the samples were RNA quality and yield, and the RNA transcript stability of selected genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 18%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,741,936
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,119
of 4,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,641
of 170,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#61
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.