↓ Skip to main content

Telehealthcare for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telehealthcare for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007717.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susannah McLean, David Chandler, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Joseph LY Liu, Claudia Pagliari, Josip Car, Aziz Sheikh

Abstract

Healthcare systems internationally need to consider new models of care to cater for the increasing numbers of people with asthma. Telehealthcare interventions are increasingly being seen by policymakers as a potential means of delivering asthma care. We defined telehealthcare as being healthcare delivered from a distance, facilitated electronically and involving the exchange of information through the personalised interaction between a healthcare professional using their skills and judgement and the patient providing information.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 222 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Psychology 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 44 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#575,147
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,156
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,528
of 290,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.