↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Brazilian health professionals’ perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brazilian health professionals’ perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321
Authors

Felipe Silva Neves, Bruna Miranda Romano, Angélica Atala Lombelo Campos, Camila Almeida Pavam, Renata Maria Souza Oliveira, Ana Paula Carlos Cândido, Michele Pereira Netto

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 24 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 25 61%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,114,341
of 22,474,238 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#137
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,680
of 507,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,474,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.