You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brazilian health professionals’ perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felipe Silva Neves, Bruna Miranda Romano, Angélica Atala Lombelo Campos, Camila Almeida Pavam, Renata Maria Souza Oliveira, Ana Paula Carlos Cândido, Michele Pereira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#193
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,603
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.