↓ Skip to main content

The food we eat, the air we breathe: a review of the fine particulate matter-induced air quality health impacts of the global food system

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
81 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The food we eat, the air we breathe: a review of the fine particulate matter-induced air quality health impacts of the global food system
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), October 2021
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac065f
Authors

Srinidhi Balasubramanian, Nina G G Domingo, Natalie D Hunt, Madisen Gittlin, Kimberly K Colgan, Julian D Marshall, Allen L Robinson, Inês M L Azevedo, Sumil K Thakrar, Michael A Clark, Christopher W Tessum, Peter J Adams, Spyros N Pandis, Jason D Hill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#494,830
of 19,191,572 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#719
of 4,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,007
of 240,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#11
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,191,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.