↓ Skip to main content

Beyond KRAS mutation status: influence of KRAScopy number status and microRNAs on clinical outcome to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond KRAS mutation status: influence of KRAScopy number status and microRNAs on clinical outcome to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie JM Mekenkamp, Jolien Tol, Jeroen R Dijkstra, Inge de Krijger, M Elisa Vink-Börger, Shannon van Vliet, Steven Teerenstra, Eveline Kamping, Eugène Verwiel, Miriam Koopman, Gerrit A Meijer, J Han JM van Krieken, Roland Kuiper, Cornelis JA Punt, Iris D Nagtegaal

Abstract

KRAS mutation is a negative predictive factor for treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Novel predictive markers are required to further improve the selection of patients for this treatment. We assessed the influence of modification of KRAS by gene copy number aberration (CNA) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in correlation to clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 15 16%
Other 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 17 18%