↓ Skip to main content

Subtypes of primary colorectal tumors correlate with response to targeted treatment in colorectal cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subtypes of primary colorectal tumors correlate with response to targeted treatment in colorectal cell lines
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-5-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Schlicker, Garry Beran, Christine M Chresta, Gael McWalter, Alison Pritchard, Susie Weston, Sarah Runswick, Sara Davenport, Kerry Heathcote, Denis Alferez Castro, George Orphanides, Tim French, Lodewyk FA Wessels

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous and biologically poorly understood disease. To tailor CRC treatment, it is essential to first model this heterogeneity by defining subtypes of patients with homogeneous biological and clinical characteristics and second match these subtypes to cell lines for which extensive pharmacological data is available, thus linking targeted therapies to patients most likely to respond to treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
France 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 174 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 25%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 12 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 18%
Computer Science 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,654,634
of 10,263,476 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#99
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,388
of 306,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,263,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.