↓ Skip to main content

Functional Precision Medicine Provides Clinical Benefit in Advanced Aggressive Hematologic Cancers and Identifies Exceptional Responders

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
94 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Precision Medicine Provides Clinical Benefit in Advanced Aggressive Hematologic Cancers and Identifies Exceptional Responders
Published in
Cancer Discovery, October 2021
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Kornauth, Tea Pemovska, Gregory I. Vladimer, Günther Bayer, Michael Bergmann, Sandra Eder, Ruth Eichner, Martin Erl, Harald Esterbauer, Ruth Exner, Verena Felsleitner-Hauer, Maurizio Forte, Alexander Gaiger, Klaus Geissler, Hildegard T. Greinix, Wolfgang Gstöttner, Marcus Hacker, Bernd Lorenz Hartmann, Alexander W. Hauswirth, Tim Heinemann, Daniel Heintel, Mir Alireza Hoda, Georg Hopfinger, Ulrich Jaeger, Lukas Kazianka, Lukas Kenner, Barbara Kiesewetter, Nikolaus Krall, Gerhard Krajnik, Stefan Kubicek, Trang Le, Simone Lubowitzki, Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Elisabeth Menschel, Olaf Merkel, Katsuhiro Miura, Leonhard Müllauer, Peter Neumeister, Thomas Noesslinger, Katharina Ocko, Leopold Öhler, Michael Panny, Alexander Pichler, Edit Porpaczy, Gerald W. Prager, Markus Raderer, Robin Ristl, Reinhard Ruckser, Julius Salamon, Ana-Iris Schiefer, Ann-Sofie Schmolke, Ilse Schwarzinger, Edgar Selzer, Christian Sillaber, Cathrin Skrabs, Wolfgang R. Sperr, Ismet Srndic, Renate Thalhammer, Peter Valent, Emiel van der Kouwe, Katrina Vanura, Stefan Vogt, Cora Waldstein, Dominik Wolf, Christoph C. Zielinski, Niklas Zojer, Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp, Giulio Superti-Furga, Berend Snijder, Philipp B. Staber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 41 46%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 41 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#203,988
of 21,245,798 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#71
of 3,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,503
of 348,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#4
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,245,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.