↓ Skip to main content

We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amirhossein Takian, Aziz Sheikh, Nicholas Barber

Abstract

In contrast to the acute hospital sector, there have been relatively few implementations of integrated electronic health record (EHR) systems into specialist mental health settings. The National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT) in England was the most expensive IT-based transformation of public services ever undertaken, which aimed amongst other things, to implement integrated EHR systems into mental health hospitals. This paper describes the arrival, the process of implementation, stakeholders' experiences and the local consequences of the implementation of an EHR system into a mental health hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 288 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 62 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 20%
Computer Science 35 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Social Sciences 29 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 27 9%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 68 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,963,457
of 23,964,824 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,959
of 8,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,989
of 287,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#61
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,964,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.