You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can psychotherapists function as their own controls? Meta-analysis of the crossed therapist design in comparative psychotherapy trials.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4088/jcp.12r07848 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fredrik Falkenström, John C Markowitz, Hanske Jonker, Björn Philips, Rolf Holmqvist |
| Abstract |
Clinical trials sometimes have the same therapists deliver more than 1 psychotherapy, ostensibly to control for therapist effects. This "crossed therapist" design makes controlling for therapist allegiance imperative, as therapists may prefer one treatment they deliver to the other(s). Research has established a strong relationship between principal investigators' allegiances and treatment outcome. Study therapists' allegiances probably also influence outcome, yet this moderating factor on outcome has never been studied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,096,744
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
#1,139
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,134
of 203,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.