You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brief exposure to social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: Doom-scrolling has negative emotional consequences, but kindness-scrolling does not
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0257728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Buchanan, Lara B. Aknin, Shaaba Lotun, Gillian M. Sandstrom |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 26% |
| Canada | 8 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#11,607
of 24,489,051 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#151
of 211,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399
of 426,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 2,357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,489,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.