↓ Skip to main content

Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Hipercolesterolemia Familiar – 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 1,144)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Hipercolesterolemia Familiar – 2021
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2021
DOI 10.36660/abc.20210788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar, Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez, Adriana Bertolami, Raul Dias dos Santos, Ana Maria Lottenberg, Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad, José Francisco Kerr Saraiva, Ana Paula M. Chacra, Tania L. R. Martinez, Luciana Ribeiro Bahia, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca, Andre Arpad Faludi, Andrei C. Sposito, Antônio Carlos Palandri Chagas, Cinthia Elim Jannes, Cristiane Kovacs Amaral, Daniel Branco de Araújo, Dennys Esper Cintra, Elaine dos Reis Coutinho, Fernando Cesena, Hermes Toros Xavier, Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota, Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano, José Rocha Faria, Juliana Tieko Kato, Marcelo Chiara Bertolami, Marcio Hiroshi Miname, Maria Helane Costa Gurgel Castelo, Maria Sílvia Ferrari Lavrador, Roberta Marcondes Machado, Patrícia Guedes de Souza, Renato Jorge Alves, Valeria Arruda Machado, Wilson Salgado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 41 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 43 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,804,804
of 24,038,559 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#36
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,174
of 422,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,038,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.