You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walking on common ground: a cross-disciplinary scoping review on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-021-00513-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Polhemus, Laura Delgado Ortiz, Gavin Brittain, Nikolaos Chynkiamis, Francesca Salis, Heiko Gaßner, Michaela Gross, Cameron Kirk, Rachele Rossanigo, Kristin Taraldsen, Diletta Balta, Sofie Breuls, Sara Buttery, Gabriela Cardenas, Christoph Endress, Julia Gugenhan, Alison Keogh, Felix Kluge, Sarah Koch, M. Encarna Micó-Amigo, Corinna Nerz, Chloé Sieber, Parris Williams, Ronny Bergquist, Magda Bosch de Basea, Ellen Buckley, Clint Hansen, A. Stefanie Mikolaizak, Lars Schwickert, Kirsty Scott, Sabine Stallforth, Janet van Uem, Beatrix Vereijken, Andrea Cereatti, Heleen Demeyer, Nicholas Hopkinson, Walter Maetzler, Thierry Troosters, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Alison Yarnall, Clemens Becker, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Letizia Leocani, Claudia Mazzà, Lynn Rochester, Basil Sharrack, Anja Frei, Milo Puhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 37% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 63% |
| Scientists | 15 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,303,839
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#365
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,285
of 438,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.