↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic challenges in systemic amyloidosis: a case report with clinical and laboratorial pitfalls

Overview of attention for article published in Autopsy and Case Reports, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic challenges in systemic amyloidosis: a case report with clinical and laboratorial pitfalls
Published in
Autopsy and Case Reports, January 2021
DOI 10.4322/acr.2021.326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelina Maria Martins Lino, Jussara Bianchi Castelli, Roberta Shcolnik Szor, Fabio Fernandes, Vera Demarchi Aiello

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,162,729
of 19,391,192 outputs
Outputs from Autopsy and Case Reports
#88
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,839
of 287,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autopsy and Case Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,391,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them