↓ Skip to main content

Congestive heart failure in a young cat with excessive moderator bands (false tendons) in the left ventricle

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Congestive heart failure in a young cat with excessive moderator bands (false tendons) in the left ventricle
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2021
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200727
Authors

Fernanda Genro Cony, Matheus Viezzer Bianchi, Fernando Froner Argenta, Carolina Rodrigues Oliveira, Carine Stefanello, Saulo Petinatti Pavarini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,701,451
of 22,627,526 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#220
of 1,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,647
of 494,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,627,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them