↓ Skip to main content

Considering trauma exposure in the context of genetics studies of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Considering trauma exposure in the context of genetics studies of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review
Published in
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-5380-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia DiGangi, Guia Guffanti, Katie A McLaughlin, Karestan C Koenen

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating anxiety disorder. Surveys of the general population suggest that while 50-85% of Americans will experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, only 2-50% will develop PTSD. Why some individuals develop PTSD following trauma exposure while others remain resilient is a central question in the field of trauma research. For more than half a century, the role of genetic influences on PTSD has been considered as a potential vulnerability factor. However, despite the exponential growth of molecular genetic studies over the past decade, limited progress has been made in identifying true genetic variants for PTSD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Hungary 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 71 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,260,208
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#52
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,486
of 280,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.