↓ Skip to main content

The Genetics of Vitamin C Loss in Vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genomics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 468)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Genetics of Vitamin C Loss in Vertebrates
Published in
Current Genomics, August 2011
DOI 10.2174/138920211796429736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Drouin, Jean-Rémi Godin, Benoît Pagé

Abstract

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) plays important roles as an anti-oxidant and in collagen synthesis. These important roles, and the relatively large amounts of vitamin C required daily, likely explain why most vertebrate species are able to synthesize this compound. Surprisingly, many species, such as teleost fishes, anthropoid primates, guinea pigs, as well as some bat and Passeriformes bird species, have lost the capacity to synthesize it. Here, we review the genetic bases behind the repeated losses in the ability to synthesize vitamin C as well as their implications. In all cases so far studied, the inability to synthesize vitamin C is due to mutations in the L-gulono-γ-lactone oxidase (GLO) gene which codes for the enzyme responsible for catalyzing the last step of vitamin C biosynthesis. The bias for mutations in this particular gene is likely due to the fact that losing it only affects vitamin C production. Whereas the GLO gene mutations in fish, anthropoid primates and guinea pigs are irreversible, some of the GLO pseudogenes found in bat species have been shown to be reactivated during evolution. The same phenomenon is thought to have occurred in some Passeriformes bird species. Interestingly, these GLO gene losses and reactivations are unrelated to the diet of the species involved. This suggests that losing the ability to make vitamin C is a neutral trait.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 414 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 19%
Student > Master 56 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 12%
Researcher 37 9%
Other 17 4%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 117 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 4%
Chemistry 15 4%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 132 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#199,516
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Current Genomics
#4
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 131,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genomics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them