↓ Skip to main content

Association of Genetic Variants With Outcomes in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Genetic Variants With Outcomes in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Published in
JACC, October 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Escobar-Lopez, Juan Pablo Ochoa, Jesús G Mirelis, María Ángeles Espinosa, Marina Navarro, María Gallego-Delgado, Roberto Barriales-Villa, Ainhoa Robles-Mezcua, María Teresa Basurte-Elorz, Laura Gutiérrez García-Moreno, Vicente Climent, Juan Jiménez-Jaimez, María Victoria Mogollón-Jiménez, Javier Lopez, María Luisa Peña-Peña, Ana García-Álvarez, María Brion, Tomas Ripoll-Vera, Julián Palomino-Doza, Coloma Tirón, Uxua Idiazabal, Maria Noël Brögger, Soledad García-Hernández, María Alejandra Restrepo-Córdoba, Esther Gonzalez-Lopez, Irene Méndez, María Sabater, Eduardo Villacorta, José M Larrañaga-Moreira, Ana Abecia, Ana Isabel Fernández, José M García-Pinilla, José F Rodríguez-Palomares, Juan Ramón Gimeno-Blanes, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Enrique Lara-Pezzi, Fernando Domínguez, Pablo Garcia-Pavia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,034,096
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,540
of 16,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,195
of 437,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#56
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.