↓ Skip to main content

Association of Genetic Variants With Outcomes in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Genetic Variants With Outcomes in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), October 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Escobar-Lopez, Juan Pablo Ochoa, Jesús G. Mirelis, María Ángeles Espinosa, Marina Navarro, María Gallego-Delgado, Roberto Barriales-Villa, Ainhoa Robles-Mezcua, María Teresa Basurte-Elorz, Laura Gutiérrez García-Moreno, Vicente Climent, Juan Jiménez-Jaimez, María Victoria Mogollón-Jiménez, Javier Lopez, María Luisa Peña-Peña, Ana García-Álvarez, María Brion, Tomas Ripoll-Vera, Julián Palomino-Doza, Coloma Tirón, Uxua Idiazabal, Maria Noël Brögger, Soledad García-Hernández, María Alejandra Restrepo-Córdoba, Esther Gonzalez-Lopez, Irene Méndez, María Sabater, Eduardo Villacorta, José M. Larrañaga-Moreira, Ana Abecia, Ana Isabel Fernández, José M. García-Pinilla, José F. Rodríguez-Palomares, Juan Ramón Gimeno-Blanes, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Enrique Lara-Pezzi, Fernando Domínguez, Pablo Garcia-Pavia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 67%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 6 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#781,650
of 21,175,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#2,069
of 15,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,794
of 421,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#43
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,175,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.