You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A childhood obesity intervention developed by families for families: results from a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsten K Davison, Janine M Jurkowski, Kaigang Li, Sibylle Kranz, Hal A Lawson |
| Abstract |
Ineffective family interventions for the prevention of childhood obesity have, in part, been attributed to the challenges of reaching and engaging parents. With a particular focus on parent engagement, this study utilized community-based participatory research to develop and pilot test a family-centered intervention for low-income families with preschool-aged children enrolled in Head Start. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 32% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 710 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 690 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 155 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 14% |
| Researcher | 71 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 7% |
| Other | 125 | 18% |
| Unknown | 143 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 120 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 99 | 14% |
| Psychology | 70 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 87 | 12% |
| Unknown | 174 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,341,964
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#836
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,008
of 289,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.