↓ Skip to main content

Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled beta2 -agonists in adults with acute asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled beta2 -agonists in adults with acute asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parameswaran Nair, Stephen J Milan, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic condition in which sufferers may have occasional or frequent exacerbations resulting in visits to the emergency department (ED). Aminophylline has been used extensively to treat exacerbations in acute asthma settings; however, it's role is unclear especially with respect to any additional benefit when added to inhaled beta(2)-agonists.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 31 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,562,410
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,215
of 11,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,134
of 262,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#242
of 467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.