↓ Skip to main content

Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled beta2-agonists in adults with acute asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addition of intravenous aminophylline to inhaled beta2-agonists in adults with acute asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002742.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parameswaran Nair, Stephen J Milan, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic condition in which sufferers may have occasional or frequent exacerbations resulting in visits to the emergency department (ED). Aminophylline has been used extensively to treat exacerbations in acute asthma settings; however, it's role is unclear especially with respect to any additional benefit when added to inhaled beta(2)-agonists.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Unspecified 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 66%
Unspecified 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,098,506
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,406
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,560
of 257,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#224
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.