↓ Skip to main content

The Malthusian–Darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Malthusian–Darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2012.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey C. Nekola, Craig D. Allen, James H. Brown, Joseph R. Burger, Ana D. Davidson, Trevor S. Fristoe, Marcus J. Hamilton, Sean T. Hammond, Astrid Kodric-Brown, Norman Mercado-Silva, Jordan G. Okie

Abstract

Two interacting forces influence all populations: the Malthusian dynamic of exponential growth until resource limits are reached, and the Darwinian dynamic of innovation and adaptation to circumvent these limits through biological and/or cultural evolution. The specific manifestations of these forces in modern human society provide an important context for determining how humans can establish a sustainable relationship with the finite Earth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 14 5%
United States 5 2%
Mexico 4 1%
Australia 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 234 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 18%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 27 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 52%
Environmental Science 52 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 36 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,826,423
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,045
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,579
of 288,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.