You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on Twitter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1145/3479566 |
Authors |
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, Sarah Huang, Jennifer Lee, Lydia B. Chilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,446,194
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
#174
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,125
of 442,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
#27
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.