You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A differential therapeutic consideration for use of corticosteroids according to established COVID-19 clinical phenotypes in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicina Intensiva, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.medin.2021.10.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Moreno, M. Ruiz-Botella, I. Martín-Loeches, J. Gómez Álvarez, M. Jiménez Herrera, M. Bodí, F. Armestar, A. Marques Parra, Á. Estella, S. Trefler, R. Jorge García, J. Murcia Paya, P. Vidal Cortes, E. Díaz, R. Ferrer, A. Albaya-Moreno, L. Socias-Crespi, J.M. Bonell Goytisolo, S. Sancho Chinesta, A. Loza, L. Forcelledo Espina, J.C. Pozo Laderas, M. deAlba-Aparicio, L. Sánchez Montori, I. Vallverdú Perapoch, V. Hidalgo, V. Fraile Gutiérrez, A.M. Casamitjana Ortega, F. Martín Serrano, M. Nieto, M. Blasco Cortes, J. Marín-Corral, J. Solé-Violán, A. Rodríguez, on behalf COVID-19 SEMICYUC Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 59% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Librarian | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,633,016
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Medicina Intensiva
#26
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,669
of 442,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicina Intensiva
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.