↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Prevalence evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the city of São Paulo, 2020–2021

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the city of São Paulo, 2020–2021
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, October 2021
DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003970
Pubmed ID
34706038
Authors

José Olimpio Moura de Albuquerque, Gabriela Akemi Kamioka, Geraldine Madalosso, Selma Anequini Costa, Paula Bisordi Ferreira, Francisco Alberto Pino, Ana Paula Sayuri Sato, Ana Carolina Aguiar de Carvalho, Ana Beatriz Pagliaro Amorim, Caroline Cotrim Aires, Ana Paula Arruda Geraldes Kataoka, Elisa San Martin Mouriz Savani, Thirsa Alvares Franco Bessa, Breno Souza de Aguiar, Marcelo Antunes Failla, Edson Aparecido dos Santos, Edjane Maria Torreão Brito, Maria Cristina Honório dos Santos, Solange Maria Saboia e Silva, Luiz Artur Vieira Caldeira, Luiz Carlos Zamarco, Sandra Maria Sabino Fonseca, Marcia Maria de Cerqueira Lima, Ivanilda Argenau Marques, Fabiana Érica Vilanova da Silva, Paula Regina Glasser, Patrícia Carla Piragibe Ramos Burihan, Cinthya Luzia Cavazzana, Debora Silva de Mello, Alessandra Cristina Guedes Pellini, Fernando Yoshiki Nishio, Fernanda Miyashiro Kian, Elza de Santana Braga, Nilza Maria Piassi Bertelli, Wagner Fracini, Marcelo Dell Áquila Gonçalves, Paulete Secco Zular, Regiane de Santana Piva, Eduardo Masi

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,734,278
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#126
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,486
of 439,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.