↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 236 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 13%
Researcher 32 13%
Other 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 8%
Other 82 33%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 52%
Social Sciences 26 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Psychology 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 32 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,108,149
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#632
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,249
of 264,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.