↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 28 13%
Other 23 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Other 75 35%
Unknown 13 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 52%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Psychology 11 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 21 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,532,407
of 15,089,180 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#546
of 1,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,432
of 258,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#10
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,089,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.