↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 245 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Other 23 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 8%
Other 87 34%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 52%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Psychology 13 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 34 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,655,586
of 17,930,534 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#723
of 2,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,707
of 266,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,930,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.