↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 292 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Other 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 24 8%
Other 101 33%
Unknown 39 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 50%
Social Sciences 29 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Psychology 14 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 50 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,267,275
of 20,513,123 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#766
of 2,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,453
of 285,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,513,123 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.