↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 345 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 13%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Other 30 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 7%
Other 108 30%
Unknown 73 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Psychology 14 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 86 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,578,392
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#343
of 2,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,390
of 114,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#29
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.