↓ Skip to main content

The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/01421590902866218
Authors

Peter Dieckmann, Susanne Molin Friis, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 170 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Other 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 71 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 51%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Unspecified 14 7%
Psychology 11 6%
Other 26 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,701,823
of 13,095,117 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#688
of 1,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,346
of 254,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,095,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.