You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motor improvements enabled by spinal cord stimulation combined with physical training after spinal cord injury: review of experimental evidence in animals and humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioelectronic Medicine, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42234-021-00077-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ismael Seáñez, Marco Capogrosso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 56% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,499,119
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#25
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,979
of 440,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them