↓ Skip to main content

Unilateral pallidotomy versus bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: one year follow-up of a randomised observer-blind multi centre trial

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unilateral pallidotomy versus bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: one year follow-up of a randomised observer-blind multi centre trial
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00701-006-0907-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. A. J. Esselink, R. M. A. de Bie, R. J. de Haan, E. N. H. J. Steur, G. N. Beute, A. T. Portman, P. R. Schuurman, D. A. Bosch, J. D. Speelman

Abstract

To investigate whether STN stimulation is more efficacious than unilateral pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) one year after surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Neuroscience 13 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,325,190
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,528
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,780
of 68,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them