You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00648-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anika Singanayagam, Seran Hakki, Jake Dunning, Kieran J Madon, Michael A Crone, Aleksandra Koycheva, Nieves Derqui-Fernandez, Jack L Barnett, Michael G Whitfield, Robert Varro, Andre Charlett, Rhia Kundu, Joe Fenn, Jessica Cutajar, Valerie Quinn, Emily Conibear, Wendy Barclay, Paul S Freemont, Graham P Taylor, Shazaad Ahmad, Maria Zambon, Neil M Ferguson, Ajit Lalvani, Anjna Badhan, Simon Dustan, Chitra Tejpal, Anjeli V Ketkar, Janakan Sam Narean, Sarah Hammett, Eimear McDermott, Timesh Pillay, Hamish Houston, Constanta Luca, Jada Samuel, Samuel Bremang, Samuel Evetts, John Poh, Charlotte Anderson, David Jackson, Shahjahan Miah, Joanna Ellis, Angie Lackenby |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20,455 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1285 | 6% |
Spain | 888 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 686 | 3% |
France | 525 | 3% |
Canada | 404 | 2% |
Japan | 404 | 2% |
Germany | 312 | 2% |
Italy | 229 | 1% |
Australia | 215 | 1% |
Other | 2757 | 13% |
Unknown | 12750 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19451 | 95% |
Scientists | 443 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 340 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 179 | <1% |
Unknown | 42 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 600 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 600 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 79 | 13% |
Other | 59 | 10% |
Student > Master | 51 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 7% |
Other | 101 | 17% |
Unknown | 219 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 4% |
Other | 125 | 21% |
Unknown | 244 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#42
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2
of 5,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4
of 511,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.