You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Albert Boonstra, Manda Broekhuis |
| Abstract |
The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,061 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | <1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Kenya | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1011 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 237 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 131 | 12% |
| Researcher | 103 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 79 | 7% |
| Other | 217 | 20% |
| Unknown | 212 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 246 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 171 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 101 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 78 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 7% |
| Other | 144 | 14% |
| Unknown | 246 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,725,322
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,121
of 7,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,499
of 96,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.