↓ Skip to main content

Playing dead to stay alive: death-feigning in Liolaemus occipitalis (Squamata: Liolaemidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 217)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Playing dead to stay alive: death-feigning in Liolaemus occipitalis (Squamata: Liolaemidae)
Published in
Biota Neotropica, December 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1676-06032010000400043
Authors

Maurício Beux dos Santos, Mauro Cesar Lamim Martins de Oliveira, Laura Verrastro, Alexandro Marques Tozetti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 13%
Peru 2 3%
Australia 2 3%
China 1 1%
Unknown 53 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 72%
Environmental Science 10 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,457,954
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#16
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,302
of 181,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.