You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep01042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren J. N. Brent, Sarah R. Heilbronner, Julie E. Horvath, Janis Gonzalez-Martinez, Angelina Ruiz-Lambides, Athy G. Robinson, J. H. Pate Skene, Michael L. Platt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 71% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 294 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 26% |
| Researcher | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 41% |
| Psychology | 28 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#505,748
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,601
of 141,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,558
of 291,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#14
of 385 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 385 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.