↓ Skip to main content

Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren J. N. Brent, Sarah R. Heilbronner, Julie E. Horvath, Janis Gonzalez-Martinez, Angelina Ruiz-Lambides, Athy G. Robinson, J. H. Pate Skene, Michael L. Platt

Abstract

Sociality is believed to have evolved as a strategy for animals to cope with their environments. Yet the genetic basis of sociality remains unclear. Here we provide evidence that social network tendencies are heritable in a gregarious primate. The tendency for rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, to be tied affiliatively to others via connections mediated by their social partners - analogous to friends of friends in people - demonstrated additive genetic variance. Affiliative tendencies were predicted by genetic variation at two loci involved in serotonergic signalling, although this result did not withstand correction for multiple tests. Aggressive tendencies were also heritable and were related to reproductive output, a fitness proxy. Our findings suggest that, like humans, the skills and temperaments that shape the formation of multi-agent relationships have a genetic basis in nonhuman primates, and, as such, begin to fill the gaps in our understanding of the genetic basis of sociality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 281 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 26%
Researcher 58 20%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 35 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 42%
Psychology 28 9%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Environmental Science 14 5%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 55 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#441,623
of 23,655,983 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,939
of 127,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,321
of 286,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#13
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,655,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.