↓ Skip to main content

Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
35 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Treweek, Andrew D Oxman, Philip Alderson, Patrick M Bossuyt, Linn Brandt, Jan Brożek, Marina Davoli, Signe Flottorp, Robin Harbour, Suzanne Hill, Alessandro Liberati, Helena Liira, Holger J Schünemann, Sarah Rosenbaum, Judith Thornton, Per Olav Vandvik, Pablo Alonso-Coello

Abstract

Healthcare decision makers face challenges when using guidelines, including understanding the quality of the evidence or the values and preferences upon which recommendations are made, which are often not clear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 175 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Researcher 29 15%
Other 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Computer Science 10 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 39 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,281,650
of 22,139,693 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#263
of 1,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,654
of 296,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,139,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.