You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shelley Peacock, Stephanie Konrad, Erin Watson, Darren Nickel, Nazeem Muhajarine |
| Abstract |
The effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visitations on improving the circumstances of disadvantaged families is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visiting programs on developmental and health outcomes of young children from disadvantaged families. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 357 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 21% |
| Researcher | 59 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 21% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 70 | 19% |
| Psychology | 51 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 86 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#990,590
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,070
of 15,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,459
of 289,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.