You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated dose dispensing service for primary healthcare patients: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juha Sinnemäki, Sinikka Sihvo, Jaana Isojärvi, Marja Blom, Marja Airaksinen, Antti Mäntylä |
| Abstract |
An automated dose dispensing (ADD) service has been implemented in primary healthcare in some European countries. In this service, regularly used medicines are machine-packed into unit-dose bags for each time of administration. The aim of this study is to review the evidence for ADD's influence on the appropriateness of medication use, medication safety, and costs in primary healthcare. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,173,756
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,292
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,366
of 292,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.