↓ Skip to main content

The automation of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
101 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The automation of systematic reviews
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f139
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Tsafnat, A. Dunn, P. Glasziou, E. Coiera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 110 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 17 14%
Librarian 12 10%
Professor 10 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Computer Science 23 19%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 18 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#224,959
of 15,289,877 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,315
of 48,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,594
of 259,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#35
of 779 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,289,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 779 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.