↓ Skip to main content

The automation of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
102 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The automation of systematic reviews
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f139
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Tsafnat, A. Dunn, P. Glasziou, E. Coiera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Researcher 15 15%
Librarian 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Professor 7 7%
Other 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 35%
Computer Science 17 18%
Unspecified 15 15%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 15 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#150,772
of 12,340,937 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,301
of 40,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,712
of 264,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#35
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.