↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of illegal hunting, culling of pest species, road accidents and feral dogs to biodiversity loss in established oil-palm landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of illegal hunting, culling of pest species, road accidents and feral dogs to biodiversity loss in established oil-palm landscapes
Published in
Wildlife Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1071/wr12036
Authors

Badrul Azhar, David Lindenmayer, Jeff Wood, Joern Fischer, Adrian Manning, Chris McElhinny, Mohamed Zakaria

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 29 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 43%
Environmental Science 46 23%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#973
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,899
of 280,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#27
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.