↓ Skip to main content

Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral tube feeding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004030.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Dieter Katzberg, Michael Benatar

Abstract

Enteral feeding (tube feeding) is offered to many people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease experiencing difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) and maintaining adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,516,717
of 15,802,296 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,936
of 11,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,952
of 262,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,802,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.