↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus non‐surgical management of abdominal injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007383.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oyo-Ita A, Ugare UG, Ikpeme IA, Oyo-Ita, Angela, Ugare, Udey G, Ikpeme, Ikpeme A

Abstract

Injury to the abdomen can be blunt or penetrating. Abdominal injury can damage internal organs such as the liver, spleen, kidneys, and intestine. There are controversies about the best approach to manage abdominal injuries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 20%
Other 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 94%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,531,408
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,977
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,595
of 290,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#286
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.