↓ Skip to main content

Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change
Published in
Environmental Evidence, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-1-13
Authors

Robert Munroe, Dilys Roe, Nathalie Doswald, Tom Spencer, Iris Möller, Bhaskar Vira, Hannah Reid, Andreas Kontoleon, Alessandra Giuliani, Ivan Castelli, Jen Stephens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Sweden 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 188 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 25%
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Other 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 100 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 7%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 24 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,405,669
of 14,079,326 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#126
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,210
of 252,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,079,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.