You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A non-lethal method for studying scorpion venom gland transcriptomes, with a review of potentially suitable taxa to which it can be applied
PLOS ONE, November 2021
Freek J. Vonk, Mátyás A. Bittenbinder, Harald M. I. Kerkkamp, Dwin G. B. Grashof, John P. Archer, Sandra Afonso, Michael K. Richardson, Jeroen Kool, Arie van der Meijden
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||78%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||8%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||31%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||8%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||8%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,213,557 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
of 208,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 509,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
of 2,603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.