↓ Skip to main content

Early versus later initiation of parenteral nutrition for very preterm infants: a propensity score-matched observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus later initiation of parenteral nutrition for very preterm infants: a propensity score-matched observational study
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabita Uthaya, Nicholas Longford, Cheryl Battersby, Kayleigh Oughham, Julia Lanoue, Neena Modi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Unknown 8 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,229,382
of 21,965,357 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#170
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,572
of 494,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,965,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.