↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
231 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen J Chatterjee, Simon YW Ho, Ian Barnes, Colin Groves

Abstract

The primates are among the most broadly studied mammalian orders, with the published literature containing extensive analyses of their behavior, physiology, genetics and ecology. The importance of this group in medical and biological research is well appreciated, and explains the numerous molecular phylogenies that have been proposed for most primate families and genera. Composite estimates for the entire order have been infrequently attempted, with the last phylogenetic reconstruction spanning the full range of primate evolutionary relationships having been conducted over a decade ago.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 4%
Germany 5 1%
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 311 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 25%
Researcher 61 17%
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 26 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 213 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 9%
Environmental Science 18 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 4%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 38 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#806,720
of 19,993,704 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#162
of 2,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,734
of 282,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#7
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,993,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.